A reminder to all of my fellow activists online.

There’s always going to be controversy over this, so let’s put it straight-up here.

Yes, it is possible to be racist, individually, towards everyone. Or sexist. Or anything. It is impossible for the institution and society we live in to oppress everyone, especially those with privilege, but you can still discriminate based on race. 

I repeat that in simple terms: It is still possible to be an asshole based on someone’s skin color. Or sex. Or sexual orientation. Or anything.

Oppression is one-way, but human decency is not.

If you want to disapprove of this (we acknowledge you have anger by the way), you are only reinforcing the hierarchies - the socially constructed bullshit hierarchies - by tossing oil for the actually racist/sexist/heteronormative/classist institution to keep the cogs turning, because they don’t want to see anything past the disgusting rage you have. They don’t believe you deserve equality. That’s just what the system wants — your anger, your rage, a fuel for a fire that they keep burning. They want your emotions to cancel out your reasoning. 

Oh, and I know they exaggerate, all the time. The concept of all feminists being Feminazis is complete bullshit, I know, I get that bullshit all the time from my own classmates back home. But the extreme hatred and methods of many - many who you can’t deny exist, especially on a site like tumblr - cause turmoil for all of us, in the end, in which we can’t see the clear truth in a heat wave, and we become lost and choke out and never reach the goal. 

We have strong activists out there who work hard and keep their cool, and for every time we can do the same and point out the rage of those who object to our mere thoughts instead of… well, proving their point, right in their faces, or every time we protest and show that we didn’t deserve tear gas or pepper spray or a middle finger, or arrests, or the catcalls or cussing… We show the heart of our purpose — that all we want is human decency.

They want to climb. They want to kick us down. But if you are to stand tall, be a statue, not a tank, because although one fights, it also is fought against. History remembers the statues, the symbols, those who represent and stand proud. 

They, those who oppress, should be the angriest at the end of it all, the ones kicking and screaming, at the end of it all, because we think, and those thoughts should be kind thoughts for all of humanity, and they do not want that. 

Do not forget that when you talk to them. 

(Of course, we can make exceptions for people like Todd Akin who never seem to get it as much as we try to drill it into their heads.)

Holy shit

racismschool:

n1gguh:

Read More

This is Amanda. She is a white girl with the url “n1gguh.” She goes to the school where they did the SUPER FUNNY Black face and domestic violence skit. This white girl with the url “N!gguh” doesn’t think the skit was the least bit racist. She sees it as a joke. She thinks we should remove the sticks from our butts. She also notes that the skit was approved by the school. I’d particularly like to point this out to those that think adults that condone racism DON’T affect the children around them. 

Just in case her post get’s deleted, here’s a copy:

Simply put, THIS is what happens when NO ONE stands up against racism. This is the MIND SET of children who are around racist adults. This is what happens when children are encouraged by racists adults. This is what happens when racism is allowed to be “A joke.”

THEY START AS RACIST CHILDREN WHO BECOME RACIST ADULTS. 

…but it’s okay ‘cause it was just a joke. Amirite?

becauseiamawoman:

Fem Art Friday Feature: Kara Walker

Contemporary artist Kara Walker deals with the complicated issues of race, gender, and sexuality in her art pieces. These themes are often explored through her well-known silhouettes pieces. In her own words…

“I was really searching for a format to sort of encapsulate, to simplify complicated things…And some of it spoke to me as: ‘it’s a medium…historically, it’s a craft…and it’s very middle-class.’ It spoke to me in the same way that the minstrel show does…it’s middle class white people rendering themselves black, making themselves somewhat invisible, or taking on an alternate identity because of the anonymity … and because the shadow also speaks about so much of our psyche. You can play out different roles when you’re rendered black, or halfway invisible.” [Source]

Mount Holyoke has one full suite of her collection, Harper’s Pictorial History of the Civil War (Annotated). It’s really thoughtful and awesome and well-done. 

enblaque:

face-down-asgard-up:

thisisnotpinoy:

pag-asaharibon:

Is “Gangnam Style” a Hit Because of Our Asian Stereotypes?
If you haven’t been following South Korean rapper PSY’s meteoric ascent to transcultural ubiquity, allow me to get you up to speed: “Gangnam Style” is now the most-watched Korean pop music video on YouTube, and as of last Thursday, the most-liked of all time, according to the Guinness Book of World Records. The song, which currently tops the iTunes charts in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and a half-dozen European countries, just jumped to the 11th spot on Billboard’s Hot 100 after debuting at No. 64 hardly a week ago.
Since its release on July 15, PSY’s addictive new single has been dissected, parodied,translated, and meme’d (Move over, #YOLO). It’s inspired propaganda in North Korea, a gun fight in Bangkok, and this surreal moment on the Ellen DeGeneres Show. Justin Bieber’s manager promises to turn PSY into an American shining star. E! declares “Gangnam Style” is soin, it’s already out. Like a knight in a one-button tuxedo, Jae-Sang Park, the 34-year-old father of twins, galloped into our cultural consciousness atop his invisible horsey and captured our hearts with his irresistible hook and four-step jig.
-Pop heavyweights like Girls’ Generation and 2NE1 have spread hallyu (meaning “Korean Wave”) popular culture across the globe, garnering devoted fan followings in East Asia and Latin America. (Part of a Brazilian rainforest is named after K-Pop veteran Seo Taiji.) Carefully pruned and primped for mass consumption, these idol groups have made some inroads in the United States, particularly in coastal cities, like Los Angeles and New York, where immigrant subcultures proliferate. Yet PSY, after more than a decade in the business, has accomplished what these glossy young superstars have ceaselessly failed to do: He’s entered the American mainstream.
But why?
Part of the video’s mass appeal is obvious: PSY, a longtime comedic performer, is downright hilarious in “Gangnam Style.” His song is catchy; his dance moves are easy to replicate (though, poorly—”ride” at your own peril). His latest song-and-dance number doesn’t depart from his usual shtick. 
“Gangnam Style” is “very different than the kind of K-Pop that has been trying to break into the United States to this point. It’s got the unique factor,” says Crystal Anderson, an associate professor of English at Elon University who studies hallyu culture. “But I also think from a cultural studies point of view, we cannot discount the relationship that American culture has with Asian masculinity.”
“If you go all the way back to someone like Bruce Lee,” she continues, “Bruce Lee could not be the star of Kung Fu the television series because the United States was not ready to see an Asian male in a lead role. To date, we still don’t have a lot of lead roles taken by Asian men in television, in movies, and they are practically nonexistent in the American music scene.”
In an essay on her blog High Yellow, Anderson argues that PSY owes some of his newfound popularity to the racial stereotypes that Hollywood and the television media have long perpetuated: Think Long Duk Dong from 16 Candles or Leslie Chow from The Hangover. Like PSY, they epitomize the “comedic Asian male” trope: buffoonish, desexualized, and emasculated.
“He’s this chubby, happy guy. We can embrace that in a way we can’t embrace…other Asian male bodies that challenge the constructions of Asian masculinities that have occurred in the United States,” Anderson says.
That’s part of the reason why she thinks K-Pop’s chiseled male idols, like the South Korean heart throbs in Big Bang, have had a particularly tough time making headway in the American music market.
A blogger at Racialicious makes a similar point:

You only have to look at a handful of other Asian and Asian American men that have made any impression in mainstream American music to guess what role PSY fits. Just this year, Korean American Heejun Han made it to the elusive top ten of American Idol and, while his buttery baritone did cut muster, it was his off-stage antics as a hilariously deadpan prankster that the public particularly reacted to. Before Han, the other Asian male that made any particular impact in American mainstream music was William Hung. Yeah.


That’s right: alongside clowns from other mediums like Ken Jeong (and yellow-face disgraces like Mickey Rooney’s Mr. Yunoishi from Breakfast at Tiffany’s), PSY fits right into the mainstream-friendly role of Asian male jester, offering goofy laughs for all and, thanks to PSY’s decidedly non-pop star looks, in a very non-threatening package. Psy doesn’t even have to sing in English or be understood because it’s not the social critique offered by the lyrics that matters to the audience, but the marriage of the funny music video, goofy dance, and a rather catchy tune, of which two of the elements are comical and, again, non-threatening.

PSY is the “Asian man who makes it” because he fits neatly into our pop cultural milieu wherein Asian men are either kung-fu fighters, Confucius-quoting clairvoyants, or the biggest geeks in high school.
What do you think? Are we laughing with PSY as he takes his rightful place in pop cultural history? Or at him, as Anderson believes? Watch the video (for, admit it, the upteenth time this month).

Living in a place where every race listens to K-pop and everyone gets the point of the video, it would easy to say that Gangnam Style’s appeal isn’t racist. But judging the YT comments, it’s very clear that the majority don’t understand that this is a satire of K-pop.
Kpop fans understand that he is mocking the overmasculine, hypersexualized Korean celebrity
Gangnam fans think it’s funny because everyone knows Asian (that monolithic group) men are effeminite, sterile things.
Kpop fans who know what Gangnam is see a parody of the frivilous lifestyle of the rich and famous.
Gangnam fans want to know that the view they have of Asians as deviants is a universal perspective.
Not all of Gangnam Style’s success is due to racism and Western stereotypes, but for a lot of white people…

Bolded for fuckin truuuuuth

I really glad this post is here because it really has been making me uncomfortable seeing white people at my job talk about this mv without any context. And I could never really pinpoint WHY. This makes it easier to see. This one boy, who is quite overweight himself, sees it as this guy who isn’t “conventionally” attractive being “a boss.” And while I think it’s sort of cool that he can relate to PSY in that way, he’s missing the point of the mv and song, which makes more sense if you’re a kpop fan (which he is not).

It concerns me a bit when I realize that my friends and I enjoy the songs for different reasons - I instantly figured that it was a parody of its own genre (see: LMFAO) but at the same time everyone else just sees it as, “Oh, ahaha, Asian shit is so funny.”  

enblaque:

face-down-asgard-up:

thisisnotpinoy:

pag-asaharibon:

Is “Gangnam Style” a Hit Because of Our Asian Stereotypes?

If you haven’t been following South Korean rapper PSY’s meteoric ascent to transcultural ubiquity, allow me to get you up to speed: “Gangnam Style” is now the most-watched Korean pop music video on YouTube, and as of last Thursday, the most-liked of all time, according to the Guinness Book of World Records. The song, which currently tops the iTunes charts in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and a half-dozen European countries, just jumped to the 11th spot on Billboard’s Hot 100 after debuting at No. 64 hardly a week ago.

Since its release on July 15, PSY’s addictive new single has been dissectedparodied,translated, and meme’d (Move over, #YOLO). It’s inspired propaganda in North Korea, a gun fight in Bangkok, and this surreal moment on the Ellen DeGeneres ShowJustin Bieber’s manager promises to turn PSY into an American shining star. E! declares “Gangnam Style” is soinit’s already out. Like a knight in a one-button tuxedo, Jae-Sang Park, the 34-year-old father of twins, galloped into our cultural consciousness atop his invisible horsey and captured our hearts with his irresistible hook and four-step jig.

-Pop heavyweights like Girls’ Generation and 2NE1 have spread hallyu (meaning “Korean Wave”) popular culture across the globe, garnering devoted fan followings in East Asia and Latin America. (Part of a Brazilian rainforest is named after K-Pop veteran Seo Taiji.) Carefully pruned and primped for mass consumption, these idol groups have made some inroads in the United States, particularly in coastal cities, like Los Angeles and New York, where immigrant subcultures proliferate. Yet PSY, after more than a decade in the business, has accomplished what these glossy young superstars have ceaselessly failed to do: He’s entered the American mainstream.

But why?

Part of the video’s mass appeal is obvious: PSY, a longtime comedic performer, is downright hilarious in “Gangnam Style.” His song is catchy; his dance moves are easy to replicate (though, poorly—”ride” at your own peril). His latest song-and-dance number doesn’t depart from his usual shtick. 

“Gangnam Style” is “very different than the kind of K-Pop that has been trying to break into the United States to this point. It’s got the unique factor,” says Crystal Anderson, an associate professor of English at Elon University who studies hallyu culture. “But I also think from a cultural studies point of view, we cannot discount the relationship that American culture has with Asian masculinity.”

“If you go all the way back to someone like Bruce Lee,” she continues, “Bruce Lee could not be the star of Kung Fu the television series because the United States was not ready to see an Asian male in a lead role. To date, we still don’t have a lot of lead roles taken by Asian men in television, in movies, and they are practically nonexistent in the American music scene.”

In an essay on her blog High YellowAnderson argues that PSY owes some of his newfound popularity to the racial stereotypes that Hollywood and the television media have long perpetuated: Think Long Duk Dong from 16 Candles or Leslie Chow from The Hangover. Like PSY, they epitomize the “comedic Asian male” trope: buffoonish, desexualized, and emasculated.

“He’s this chubby, happy guy. We can embrace that in a way we can’t embrace…other Asian male bodies that challenge the constructions of Asian masculinities that have occurred in the United States,” Anderson says.

That’s part of the reason why she thinks K-Pop’s chiseled male idols, like the South Korean heart throbs in Big Bang, have had a particularly tough time making headway in the American music market.

A blogger at Racialicious makes a similar point:

You only have to look at a handful of other Asian and Asian American men that have made any impression in mainstream American music to guess what role PSY fits. Just this year, Korean American Heejun Han made it to the elusive top ten of American Idol and, while his buttery baritone did cut muster, it was his off-stage antics as a hilariously deadpan prankster that the public particularly reacted to. Before Han, the other Asian male that made any particular impact in American mainstream music was William Hung. Yeah.

That’s right: alongside clowns from other mediums like Ken Jeong (and yellow-face disgraces like Mickey Rooney’s Mr. Yunoishi from Breakfast at Tiffany’s), PSY fits right into the mainstream-friendly role of Asian male jester, offering goofy laughs for all and, thanks to PSY’s decidedly non-pop star looks, in a very non-threatening package. Psy doesn’t even have to sing in English or be understood because it’s not the social critique offered by the lyrics that matters to the audience, but the marriage of the funny music video, goofy dance, and a rather catchy tune, of which two of the elements are comical and, again, non-threatening.

PSY is the “Asian man who makes it” because he fits neatly into our pop cultural milieu wherein Asian men are either kung-fu fighters, Confucius-quoting clairvoyants, or the biggest geeks in high school.

What do you think? Are we laughing with PSY as he takes his rightful place in pop cultural history? Or at him, as Anderson believes? Watch the video (for, admit it, the upteenth time this month).

Living in a place where every race listens to K-pop and everyone gets the point of the video, it would easy to say that Gangnam Style’s appeal isn’t racist. But judging the YT comments, it’s very clear that the majority don’t understand that this is a satire of K-pop.

Kpop fans understand that he is mocking the overmasculine, hypersexualized Korean celebrity

Gangnam fans think it’s funny because everyone knows Asian (that monolithic group) men are effeminite, sterile things.

Kpop fans who know what Gangnam is see a parody of the frivilous lifestyle of the rich and famous.

Gangnam fans want to know that the view they have of Asians as deviants is a universal perspective.

Not all of Gangnam Style’s success is due to racism and Western stereotypes, but for a lot of white people…

Bolded for fuckin truuuuuth

I really glad this post is here because it really has been making me uncomfortable seeing white people at my job talk about this mv without any context. And I could never really pinpoint WHY. This makes it easier to see. This one boy, who is quite overweight himself, sees it as this guy who isn’t “conventionally” attractive being “a boss.” And while I think it’s sort of cool that he can relate to PSY in that way, he’s missing the point of the mv and song, which makes more sense if you’re a kpop fan (which he is not).

It concerns me a bit when I realize that my friends and I enjoy the songs for different reasons - I instantly figured that it was a parody of its own genre (see: LMFAO) but at the same time everyone else just sees it as, “Oh, ahaha, Asian shit is so funny.”  

dumbthingssocialjusticeblogssay:

to answer that anon asking “why hold whites solely responsible for slavery”, it’s a little more complicated than just that. yes african and muslim societies engaged in slavery, and as a matter of fact the Arab books on the subject were used as “best practices guides up until the 1700s.

however the model of slavery practiced through the triangle trade in the americas and europe became a societal phenomenon significantly different from slavery as practiced pretty much any where else. the american south became so economically dependent on slavery and the associated structures of racial oppression, they kinda fought a war over it. the last society to be so incredibly reliant on slavery to function was ancient rome, but there was no racial aspect to their slavery - they just enslaved everybody.

even after slavery was abolished, things like one-drop laws and jim crow remained behind as a constant effort to degrade former slaves & their descendants in america. essentially, no, modern americans should not feel particularly “guilty” about slavery. because that’s unproductive and serves no purpose. but we should be cognizant that our country was built on a particularly pernicious and vile form of slavery, and we’re still feeling the fallout from the practice even today.

on a new type of racism - “separation”

Don’t mind me, I’m going to be the devil’s advocate here for a few things.

Read More

sweetiebel:

riningear:

bad-dominicana:

you want reverse racism?

k

lemme shove you out all the positions of power

deny you access to all your basic needs

quarter, skin, hang, burn, villify and enslave you

en masse

degrade every last physical trait and your existence

and take credit for anything youve ever done well

for several hundreds years at that

and then

we can talk about how

“reverse racist” i am

or we can talk about how the color of your skin doesn’t make you any less of an asshole if you’re kicking and screaming like a kid about how EVERYONE WHO IS WHITE IS TERRIBLE BECAUSE ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE SLAVE DRIVERS 

the issue is that people refuse to acknowledge these sorts of people exist - the fact that there’s a few of these types doesn’t mean they don’t exist 

being an ethnic minority does not change the fact that anyone can be a racist asshole 

let’s go over this again kiddies 

anyone can be an asshole about skin color regardless of skin color 

it’s not that hard to understand 

okay this is slightly off from the topic but

can we just take note of how stupid the phrase “reverse racism” is???

like first, the way it’s used implies the only racism is that against people of color or whatever? and second, the actual reverse of racism would be pretty fucking awesome, right? I mean, it would be like, treating everyone awesomely no matter the color of their skin!! or something along those lines.

racism is not a one-way street. it does not only happen to certain people (not the way people commonly use it anyways, which is more referring to prejudice, but that is a matter of semantics). “reverse racism” is not “racism against whites”. if you are racist/prejudice against whites, it’s still just racism. no special terms going on here, it’s the same type of asshole attitude.

soyeah

“reverse racism” does exist. it’s called being a decent human being. (ps: OP isn’t one if they think racism can only occur in one direction)

dear world 

racism is embedded within an individual, not necessarily a group 

a group or society’s customs do not invalidate racism in a single individual 

a group or society can affect the racism  

but just because the group or society doesn’t think it’s there 

that doesn’t mean it’s not there 

therefore 

it’s stupid to say that you can’t be racist against whites 

because non-whites can have racist attitudes against whites 

racism is at the end of it all a mindset

denying that a group of humans like yourself can have the racist mindset means you yourself are degrading them as humans as well 

cussandfight:

civilrightsbrah:

it’s terrifying to think that we live in a world that cares more about transphobia and helping out people that think they’re fucking dragons and shit more than racism

it blows my mind really

i don’t think any social issue is higher than racism okay there are 16 year old kids that   live in good neighborhoods and have access to the internet that think they’re dogs just because they’re bored and then there are people like trayvon martin that get killed just because somebody is a racist asshole

i just didn’t get the memo that racism isn’t an issue to people apparently only protecting people that arent straight is the biggest issue to people now

THIS JUST IN, THINKING YOU’RE A DOG/DRAGON IS THE SAME AS BEING TRANS*.

(quick shout out to my trans* POC brothers and sister)

the point is somewhat valid but the person is an asshat about it 

fucknointellectualfails:

Boy in school runs our branch of Kony 2012. Doesn’t research it. Surprised to learn of its less beneficial side. Continues campaign anyway.

fucknointellectualfails:

Boy in school runs our branch of Kony 2012. Doesn’t research it. Surprised to learn of its less beneficial side. Continues campaign anyway.

sighs 

there was this amazing musical on broadway that had an unfortunately-short life 

it was called 

The Scottsboro Boys 

if you know your history really well you should be able to guess what this is about 

yes, it was a true story 

tl;dr group of black men get convicted of a crime that proves to be completely fabricated and keep appealing (google it, it’s really quite a case) 

and it was done by the guys who did Cabaret and Chicago 

but the entire show was presented as a minstrel show with really happy music

and then you realize “holy fuck the context” 

the entire movie is about black men being abused by the justice system 

I mean jeez there’s a kid doing this intense tap number about nightmares of being sent to the electric chair 

and the entire show is really uncomfortable because you sit there realizing how bad the system is/was

and that’s what made the show so good

and there’s all these black people that are like “oh it’s a minstrel show it’s terrible and racist and dangerous to african-american history”

it’s understandable if you hear things out of context because they actually have blackface on blacks at the end 

but you really can’t “get” the show until you see it  

and you get all these feelings, like, you don’t know whether to be angry or sad or tap your feet with the music 

and that’s really what made it a work of art 

waltdisneyconfessions:

“I hate when people say that Walt Disney was racist just because most of his characters were white. That’s the way things were back then, and if he made an African American princess he would probably get killed. DO NOT blame Walt for the society’s discrimination.”

YES THIS. 
Okay, here’s the thing. Walt Disney was living in the post-WWII era. There were all sorts of racial and cultural scares, especially the Communist one, which Walt addressed regularly as a “proud American.” They were also phasing out of a Japanese racism phase due to Pearl Harbor (the reason why just saying “Japs” is racist). And you all know about the Jim Crow laws. 
It would have been terrible for business and publicity if he had done anything multicultural. Whether or not he was actually racist is completely unknown, but no matter what production studio you were in that age, making things “multicultural” is like cliff diving with rocks scattered at the bottom. You might make it, you might not.   

waltdisneyconfessions:

I hate when people say that Walt Disney was racist just because most of his characters were white. That’s the way things were back then, and if he made an African American princess he would probably get killed. DO NOT blame Walt for the society’s discrimination.”

YES THIS. 

Okay, here’s the thing. Walt Disney was living in the post-WWII era. There were all sorts of racial and cultural scares, especially the Communist one, which Walt addressed regularly as a “proud American.” They were also phasing out of a Japanese racism phase due to Pearl Harbor (the reason why just saying “Japs” is racist). And you all know about the Jim Crow laws. 

It would have been terrible for business and publicity if he had done anything multicultural. Whether or not he was actually racist is completely unknown, but no matter what production studio you were in that age, making things “multicultural” is like cliff diving with rocks scattered at the bottom. You might make it, you might not.   

ok. um.

i-am-miku:

p5stuck:

hynerilanla:

riningear:

not even gonna trigger warning here because 

I hate the whole 

“you’re insulting the entire Native American culture by wearing that ‘cherokee’ piece” 

no just stop 

I know it’s really depressing how oppressive caucasians have been in the Americas for the last couple hundred years 

but please don’t treat it like we’re mocking them 

it’s perfectly okay to appreciate the aesthetics of a culture as long as we remain respectful

if it’s suddenly wrong to get upset because of beauty and clothing appreciation then here’s a list of things I should have a flaming rage about 

  • plastering characters of East Asian languages all over our clothes and tattoos 
  • celebrating Chinese New Year if you’re not Chinese  
  • Americans drawing in an anime style 
  • British citizens using henna tattoos 
  • Americans/Caucasians learning step 

please stop being “culturally sensitive” because it’s not as edgy and cool as you think 

sometimes it gets just plain annoying 

yes this is very lovely indeed

there is a difference between mocking a culture and finding things aesthetically pleasing and deciding to put them on your body

please keep note of that the next time you get in a ~socially conscious~ rage over someone wearing a shirt with a wolf on it or something.

That’s sort of missing the point of why that particular brand of wear, mostly because it is not respectful.

you see, here in BC/Vancouver, it’s actually encouraged with Aboriginal-run companies making clothing that focuses heavily on the art and nuances of the culture (BC sort of has a boner for Aboriginal art, and with good reason).

White people? Totally come to potlatches! They can buy Aboriginal items and basically roll around in the culture. You cannot step foot in an apparel store without finding at least one shred of Aboriginal art. 

This is not appropriation. This is all racial groups absorbing a cultural minority and supporting it, sort of like how history should have gone down but didn’t because everyone was a racist in the 1800s. It’s really great! The language is fading, which is kinda crap, but there are open lessons and everyone is really really interested in learning. Not the languages, the cool parts of culture. Man that sucks. There’s a boatload of racism and distrust because of the violent effect of the schools, but there’s still support

You see, that’s BC. I am positive a lot of isolated incidents act like this, but everywhere else? Aboriginal/Native peoples are kind of incidental. It’s like they don’t exist, pushed to the side of the public eye. And that’s where ~exploitation~ comes in!!

You see, when there’s a Navajo T-Shirt or “indian-style headband” at Hot Topic, that’s appropriation. I don’t blame people for wanting Navajo T-Shirts! Navajo art is pretty as fuck. But actual Native peoples are completely shoved to the side, and small Native businesses do not get any leg room. That’s exploiting a culture. You’re not racist for wearing a Navajo T-Shirt though, and shouldn’t let anyone tell you that you are. God that shit is pretty. 

So what is offensive

Back to the Indian headband. This is where it starts getting from “sucks for the Native people” to flat out “holy shit that’s pretty racist.”  

You see, Native people are not Indians. That’s what they were called Way Back In The Day because the people that landed on the continent were morons. They are Aboriginal, they are Native, they are First Nations, but they aren’t Indians. You call my family Indians, I will fucking punch you. Lightly, on the arm, for being an idiot. 

The second aspect is that the Native people of the plains don’t wear headbands. I’m serious. Doesn’t happen. They don’t wear headdresses, or tasseled hide jackets. They don’t say “HOW” or do that mouth-patting war cry. They’re normal people. This is stereotyping. The same stereotyping that leads people to associate Native people as something that does not exist anymore. The same stereotyping that makes people associate Natives with the semi-fictional cowboys. First Nations peoples are non-entities. They can’t be exploited or be racist for mocking them, because they don’t even fucking exist! There are kids who play the Xbox and watch TV and go to school, but to the public eye, they don’t exist! How fucking often do you see a movie about First Nations that didn’t focus on shit that happened centuries ago? I can think of one! Just one! The only thing I can think of is literally one Canadian TV show and a book! That’s it! That’s fucking it!

Dressing up like that is a bit like why exactly rape jokes are so bad; it’s making a joke out of a problem. It’s practically mocking the oppression of aboriginal peoples, and associates an entire race with a stereotype of a specific group of people that lived hundreds of years ago. River-folk? Pretty much anyone on the coast, or in a forest? Completely inconsequential to the media and public eye. It’s only Indians and Inuit as far as anyone is concerned. 

So yeah. Rock that Navajo shirt. Slip on a Salish hoodie. There is nothing wrong with enjoying that side of an aesthetic. But don’t make your sports team ‘The Indians’ and wear old-fashioned ~Indian~ paraphernalia. 

(I think I just agreed with your point

except

with more words

so many words

sorry

I came out on the white end of the mixed-race lottery but I was raised as an Aboriginal child and god do I ever have Feels about my culture)

Ever since meeting an Aboriginal guy online a few years ago I’ve actually became really, really conscious about how I talk about them… Mainly because I unintentionally offended him and I still feel pretty bad about that.

I really don’t know what name I can use for Aboriginals/Natives (I use these now since they are the ones you use), for example. And I am horribly uneducated on their culture. For example: I thought Aboriginals were (just?) the people living in Australia originally… It doesn’t help that I’m from Europe, so whenever I meet people from this culture online I tend to hope I don’t offend them. :/

Long story short: Ae doesn’t want to offend anyone, but doesn’t always do a good job at this.

yes these replies are good