Falling down the stairs In Anime can only go two ways
O my fuck
This shouldn’t really be a thing.
Yes it should
when will they have suicide4beiber
WHAT THE FUCK
What the actual fuck
I just…. I just don’t…
What in the ever loving fuck is wrong with these people?!
Some of these HAVE to be fake. Please?
wh…………………………
EVERYONE SIT THE FUCK DOWN
IT’S TIME FOR A LESSON IN BIOLOGY
DO YOU SEE THIS?

THESE ARE MOTHERFUCKIN’ RED BLOOD CELLS
“oh but I have millions of these in me nothing special”
NO SHUT THE FUCK UP AND TAKE A SEAT
IN FACT THESE LITTLE BADASSES ARE THE REASON WHY YOU CAN EVEN TAKE A FUCKIN’ SEAT
THEY HAVE THESE LITTLE THINGS CALLED “HEMOGLOBINS”
AND THESE LITTLE MOFOS CARRY ALL THE OXYGEN IN YOUR BODY USING CHEMICAL BONDS THROUGH YOUR ENTIRE GODDAMN BODY
SO NOW YOU’VE GOT OXYGEN ALL THE WAY FROM YOUR HEAD, SHOULDERS, KNEES DOWN TO YOUR FUCKIN’ TOES

LOOK AT THAT
THAT IS SOME COMPLEX SHIT
BUT DON’T GO ANYWHERE BECAUSE I’M NOT FUCKIN’ DONE
THEY DON’T JUST BRING IN THE OXYGEN
THEY TAKE OUT THAT CARBON DIOXIDE THAT’S A BYPRODUCT OF WHAT YOU’RE DOING ALL DAY
SO ALL DAY AND ALL NIGHT THEY’RE TAKING OUT THE MOTHERFUCKIN’ TRASH FOR YOU
GUESS WHAT?
NONE OF THESE GUYS DON’T HAVE A NUCLEUS OR ORGANELLES
AND YOU THINK RED BLOOD CELLS ARE BADASS?
DON’T EVEN GET ME STARTED WITH WHITE BLOOD CELLS
THOSE MOTHERFUCKERS ARE LIKE AN ARMY IN YOUR ARTERIES
THE BODYGUARDS OF YOUR BLOOD

THIS IS A MOTHERFUCKIN’ WHITE BLOOD CELL EATING A BACTERIUM
DO YOU REALLY WANNA MESS WITH THIS SON OF A BITCH?
I THOUGHT NOT.
SO THE NEXT TIME YOU’RE BLEEDIN’
YOU’D BETTER THANK THE FLYING FUCKIN’ SPAGHETTI MONSTER THAT YOU’RE BLEEDIN’
On Saturday (before Panelstuck) I was Jane Crocker. Who didn’t escape the Red Miles.
Serious thank you to Rachel (Malicemidnight) who helped a LOT with my makeup on this. Between the two of us it took two hours to get those two holes made up all gory like that.
Wow this is really awesome and needs way more notes.
oh my god this is amazing
Woah. That detail on the wombs…
![thedailywhat:
Controversial Magazine Spread of the Day: In an editorial Monday, Jezebel condemned Bulgarian magazine 12′s recent “fashion” spread depicting graphic violence against women. (Heads up — the photos in these links are particularly graphic. Also Not Safe For Work).
Anyway, the editors of 12 caught wind of the criticism and attempted to defend their editorial decision in a letter they sent Jezebel late Tuesday night:
Hello,
We are 12 Magazine, and we feel like we need to answer to thequestions raised in various articles online, concerning our beautyeditorial “Victim of Beauty”.
First of all, we would like to say we are happy that our shootprovoked an international discussion, at some scale.
It is also important to say, that we do NOT support violence of ANYkind, and this is NOT a shoot glamorizing, or encouraging, orsupporting violence against women.
We believe that images such as ours can be seen from various angles,and we think that exactly that is what is beautiful about fashion andphotography in general — that anybody can understand it their own way,and fill it with their own meaning. Where some see a brutal wound,others see a skilful work of an artist, or an exquisite face of abeautiful girl.
That being said, we do understand why some accuse us of promoting, ina way, violence, but we do not agree with that, and we think that itis very narrow-minded way of looking at the photographs.
And after all, isn’t it true that we see brutally wounded people allthe time, in real life — on television, in the news, in movies,videogames, magazines and websites, and they are all very different,but alike in one thing: some are real, some are not. And fashionphotography is an imitation of real life, sometimes realistic,sometimes delicate, other times grotesque, or shocking.
In closure, we are provoking even further discussion by asking you andyour readers just two questions:
1. How would you perceive those photographs, if they were accompanyingan campaign against domestic violence? Would you still think of themas disgusting or you would praise them as brave and thought-provoking?Worth the think, isn’t it?2. What would you say if those where bespoken men, carefully groomed,but still, terribly injured? Probably nothing, and quite franklythat’s a bit sexist.
Kind regards,
Huben Hubenov and Slav AnastasovEditors in Chief
Needless to say, the “sexist” Jezebel writers weren’t impressed.
[jezebel]
I actually kind of like the way they explained the photos.](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5ksw4PUP01qzpwi0o1_500.jpg)
Controversial Magazine Spread of the Day: In an editorial Monday, Jezebel condemned Bulgarian magazine 12′s recent “fashion” spread depicting graphic violence against women. (Heads up — the photos in these links are particularly graphic. Also Not Safe For Work).
Anyway, the editors of 12 caught wind of the criticism and attempted to defend their editorial decision in a letter they sent Jezebel late Tuesday night:
Hello,
We are 12 Magazine, and we feel like we need to answer to the
questions raised in various articles online, concerning our beauty
editorial “Victim of Beauty”.First of all, we would like to say we are happy that our shoot
provoked an international discussion, at some scale.It is also important to say, that we do NOT support violence of ANY
kind, and this is NOT a shoot glamorizing, or encouraging, or
supporting violence against women.We believe that images such as ours can be seen from various angles,
and we think that exactly that is what is beautiful about fashion and
photography in general — that anybody can understand it their own way,
and fill it with their own meaning. Where some see a brutal wound,
others see a skilful work of an artist, or an exquisite face of a
beautiful girl.That being said, we do understand why some accuse us of promoting, in
a way, violence, but we do not agree with that, and we think that it
is very narrow-minded way of looking at the photographs.And after all, isn’t it true that we see brutally wounded people all
the time, in real life — on television, in the news, in movies,
videogames, magazines and websites, and they are all very different,
but alike in one thing: some are real, some are not. And fashion
photography is an imitation of real life, sometimes realistic,
sometimes delicate, other times grotesque, or shocking.In closure, we are provoking even further discussion by asking you and
your readers just two questions:1. How would you perceive those photographs, if they were accompanying
an campaign against domestic violence? Would you still think of them
as disgusting or you would praise them as brave and thought-provoking?
Worth the think, isn’t it?
2. What would you say if those where bespoken men, carefully groomed,
but still, terribly injured? Probably nothing, and quite frankly
that’s a bit sexist.Kind regards,
Huben Hubenov and Slav Anastasov
Editors in ChiefNeedless to say, the “sexist” Jezebel writers weren’t impressed.
[jezebel]
I actually kind of like the way they explained the photos.
Makes me wanna hug him ;v;
Because…
I just love him
that much
( ◉ω◉)
i see your unhappy injured oliver and raise you fanfic violence
WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS OH MY GOD






![pix-original:
「untitled」/「まりもこス」のイラスト [pixiv]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1jtsrbSIQ1qd91ado1_500.jpg)




